The idea of a hydrogen-like molecule as a constituent of different molecules was created over a long period. As ahead of schedule as 1815, William Prout recommended that all iotas are made out of hydrogen particles (which he called "protyles"), focused around a shortsighted translation of right on time estimations of nuclear weights (see Prout's theory), which was refuted when more correct qualities were measured.
Ernest Rutherford at the first Solvay Conference, 1911
In 1886, Eugen Goldstein found channel beams (otherwise called anode beams) and demonstrated that they were decidedly charged (particles) delivered from gasses. In any case, since particles from diverse gasses had distinctive estimations of charge-to-mass degree (e/m), they couldn't be related to a solitary molecule, not at all like the negative electrons found by J. J. Thomson.
Emulating the disclosure of the nuclear core by Ernest Rutherford in 1911, Antonius van lair Broek recommended that the spot of every component in the intermittent table (its nuclear number) is equivalent to its atomic charge. This was affirmed tentatively by Henry Moseley in 1913 utilizing X-beam spectra.
In 1917, (in examinations reported in 1919) Rutherford demonstrated that the hydrogen core is available in other cores, a result normally depicted as the disclosure of the proton.[20] Rutherford had prior figured out how to create hydrogen cores as a kind of radiation delivered as a result of the effect of alpha particles on hydrogen gas, and remember them by their special entrance signature in air and their appearance in shine indicators. These trials were started when Rutherford had recognized that, when alpha particles were shot into air (for the most part nitrogen), his glitter locators demonstrated the marks of ordinary hydrogen cores as an item. After experimentation Rutherford followed the response to the nitrogen in air, and found that when alphas were created into immaculate nitrogen gas, the impact was bigger. Rutherford confirmed that this hydrogen could have come just from the nitrogen, and along these lines nitrogen must hold hydrogen cores. One hydrogen core was being thumped off by the effect of the alpha molecule, creating oxygen-17 the whole time. This was the initially reported atomic response, 14n + α → 17o + p. (This response would later be watched occurrence straightforwardly in a cloud chamber in 1925).
Rutherford knew hydrogen to be the least complex and lightest component and was impacted by Prout's theory that hydrogen was the building piece of all components. Revelation that the hydrogen core is available in all other cores as a rudimentary molecule, headed Rutherford to give the hydrogen core an extraordinary name as a molecule, since he suspected that hydrogen, the lightest component, held one and only of these particles. He named this new central building piece of the core the proton, after the neuter solitary of the Greek word for "first", πρῶτον. Be that as it may, Rutherford additionally had as a top priority the saying protyle as utilized by Prout. Rutherford talked at the British Association for the Advancement of Science at its Cardiff gathering starting 24 August 1920.[21] Rutherford was approached by Oliver Lodge for another name for the positive hydrogen core to maintain a strategic distance from disarray with the nonpartisan hydrogen molecule. He at first proposed both proton and prouton (after Prout).[22] Rutherford later reported that the gathering had acknowledged his recommendation that the hydrogen core be named the "proton", after Prout's word of honor "protyle".[23] The first utilization of the saying "proton" in the experimental writing showed up in
Ernest Rutherford at the first Solvay Conference, 1911
In 1886, Eugen Goldstein found channel beams (otherwise called anode beams) and demonstrated that they were decidedly charged (particles) delivered from gasses. In any case, since particles from diverse gasses had distinctive estimations of charge-to-mass degree (e/m), they couldn't be related to a solitary molecule, not at all like the negative electrons found by J. J. Thomson.
Emulating the disclosure of the nuclear core by Ernest Rutherford in 1911, Antonius van lair Broek recommended that the spot of every component in the intermittent table (its nuclear number) is equivalent to its atomic charge. This was affirmed tentatively by Henry Moseley in 1913 utilizing X-beam spectra.
In 1917, (in examinations reported in 1919) Rutherford demonstrated that the hydrogen core is available in other cores, a result normally depicted as the disclosure of the proton.[20] Rutherford had prior figured out how to create hydrogen cores as a kind of radiation delivered as a result of the effect of alpha particles on hydrogen gas, and remember them by their special entrance signature in air and their appearance in shine indicators. These trials were started when Rutherford had recognized that, when alpha particles were shot into air (for the most part nitrogen), his glitter locators demonstrated the marks of ordinary hydrogen cores as an item. After experimentation Rutherford followed the response to the nitrogen in air, and found that when alphas were created into immaculate nitrogen gas, the impact was bigger. Rutherford confirmed that this hydrogen could have come just from the nitrogen, and along these lines nitrogen must hold hydrogen cores. One hydrogen core was being thumped off by the effect of the alpha molecule, creating oxygen-17 the whole time. This was the initially reported atomic response, 14n + α → 17o + p. (This response would later be watched occurrence straightforwardly in a cloud chamber in 1925).
Rutherford knew hydrogen to be the least complex and lightest component and was impacted by Prout's theory that hydrogen was the building piece of all components. Revelation that the hydrogen core is available in all other cores as a rudimentary molecule, headed Rutherford to give the hydrogen core an extraordinary name as a molecule, since he suspected that hydrogen, the lightest component, held one and only of these particles. He named this new central building piece of the core the proton, after the neuter solitary of the Greek word for "first", πρῶτον. Be that as it may, Rutherford additionally had as a top priority the saying protyle as utilized by Prout. Rutherford talked at the British Association for the Advancement of Science at its Cardiff gathering starting 24 August 1920.[21] Rutherford was approached by Oliver Lodge for another name for the positive hydrogen core to maintain a strategic distance from disarray with the nonpartisan hydrogen molecule. He at first proposed both proton and prouton (after Prout).[22] Rutherford later reported that the gathering had acknowledged his recommendation that the hydrogen core be named the "proton", after Prout's word of honor "protyle".[23] The first utilization of the saying "proton" in the experimental writing showed up in
No comments:
Post a Comment